Better Than Botox?
Ever heard of StriVectin-SD? Probably not if you’ve never had to deal with stretch marks—a problem the cream is traditionally used to treat. Nowadays, women and men alike are applying this product to their faces to diminish the appearance of fine lines, wrinkles and crow’s feet. But is it better than Botox?
Don’t count on it. Even though StriVectin-SD is being promoted as a kind of miracle anti-wrinkle breakthrough (fashion designer Isaac Mizrahi is even pitching for it), Botox is still the preferred treatment for moderate to severe wrinkles around the brow and eye areas.
If you’re tempted to try it, and it does sound enticing, it’s probably wise to consult with a dermatologist or cosmetic surgeon beforehand. It may work best when used in conjunction with some other treatment, that is if it works at all.
Technorati Tags: botox, cosmetic surgeon, Strivectin
Bookmark to:
March 17th, 2007 at 10:14 pm
Strivectin can never even come close to the effects of Botox, nor can it claim to
Dr. Barry Lycka
President
The Ethical Cosmetic Surgery Association
September 17th, 2007 at 11:33 am
Beter than Botox? The makers won’t even answer their own question.
Two things consumers repeatedly do that they shouldn’t:
1. immediately buy into an advertiser’s claim that their product is a “miracle” treatment for this or that
2. wholeheartedly believe in celebrity endorsers who are being paid to pitch a product
Personally, I wouldn’t put just anything on my skin, especially my face (and especially when it wasn’t intended for that use), before talking with a dermatologist. Thankfully, although I’m not a doctor, I work quite a bit with one who’s administered quite a bit of Botox in San Diego.
My two cents: Botox is the number one cosmetic medical procedure in the country for a reason (because consumers have tried it and liked it and recommended it). And, Strivectin is utilizing Botox’s name for a reason… because it’s good marketing… that’s it.